The conflict becomes wild and the government uncivil.

While the wild strikes of the tram drivers have talked about a problem of civilization “we can’t live with 800 euro a month !”, the government, together with many political forces of the opposition, has put into the centre the hardness of control. Summons, administrative sanctions, denounces. Pisanu who speaks to the prefects, the prefects who speak to the power of attorney, power of attorneys that speak with some firms, everyone is looking for “desobedients” and their instigators. Maroni and Marzano ask for a review of the law on strike, they ask for the intervention of the magistrature. Biondi goes on and in addiction he talks about pickets as a form of “private violence” and ask for the head ( under criminal terms) of the organizers. The confederal union, shy and humble can’t find a place anymore and Epifani calsl for the responsability of the hatching to prevent that the wild horde would ask too much and that maybe will recognize that in the 90’ unions and centre left have struck hard work, incomes, purchasing power. From 250 to 500 euro, the administrative sanctions for thousand of workers that someone says have broken the agreement with the town. How could they break an agreement when one decides to strike to get what was already established two years ago? Face to a generalized deregulation of last years how can agreements assume a binding value? A thin thread not marginal at all binds the government answers to the wild strikes with a climate that in general is defining in this country. The movement is target of continuous attacks that have as privileged object, the social declinations of the conflict: occupy empty houses for those who have no house, no rights, this means to commit a crime against property.

From politics to judicial. The criminal association for Action, as well as for the invisible from the nord-east, have as goal the social struggles for the house and for the rights of citizenship. Where rights move from a merely witness field and of ethical claim, to the practice of direct reappropriation (as it happens also in the breaking of the rituality of the traditional general strike) new instruments of control are deployed.

Segmentalize, divide, associate, summon, recognize the responsibles or instigators, temporary leaving through the domiciliary arrests, obligate to sign. To mark as the Patriot Act in the USA has done or through some of the European antiterrorism devices, the lines of the inner war, that flexible footprints that limit the field of the democratic freedom and create anew the field of obedience outside the logics of consensus. To the economic deregulation follows a regulation through global war and control. The laws become arbitrary field and outside measure because it’s the measure itself of the political sovereignty and of the economical dynamic to be disappeared. Where more arrogant becomes the “violence of law”, there we find summons and denounces for who strikes and ask the respect of the agreements already written and re-emerges the metaphysical arbitrary of the “political violence”.

Pisanu has been performing an operation for months and this has as goal the plot of contiguity: so faithfully the comments on the tv news about the secure measures for the desobedients from Rome on the facts of the 4 October review anarco-insurrectionary parcels and arrests for Brigate Rosse. “Private violence” for a picket, violence to the property for an occupation. In the meanwhile Eurispes says that we are the last in Europe, with the more uncontrolled inflation rate, with low wages and few services but neither left wants to talk about this, so, Rutelli ask for wage cages and pensions at 70 years old and “Corriere della sera” approve it. This operation shows without many falsehood, the dimension of the inner low intensity war, that concentrates and has as enemy the point at high political intensity of the conflict. Desobedience becomes radical request that transversely marks the social composition of the struggles, becomes the viral paradigm of the exodus from the military, social and economic war.

And it is this radical and incompatible enquiry, this not representative and wild capacity to ask and take rights, the only remedy to the global war, to its inner divisions; this is patrimony to accumulate and to deploy for a new cycle of movement and for freedoms!